Follow-up Plan for Learning RTM ResultsOdd Semester 2023/2024
|
No. |
Source |
Findings |
Root of the
Problem |
Follow-up |
Feedback Form |
RTM Document |
Status |
|
1 |
1. Lecturers
have not compiled a rubric for UTS assessment |
RPS has been
systemized with digital validation |
Developing
the rubric for the mid-term test |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
2 |
1. Lecturers
have not determined the technical implementation of online shows chat / FGD
(platform) 2. UTS score
results have not been announced back to students |
Not finished
correcting |
Using the WA
group to announce lessons and Using the WA group to announce lessons. announced the
results of the mid-term test |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
3 |
UTS score
results have not been announced back to students (no evidence yet) |
Not finished
correcting |
Evaluate and
socialize S2 Management lecturers to announce assessment results to students. |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
4 |
Regular
Class: 1. The RPS
does not yet contain information about the latest teaching materials 2. Lecturers
do not have teaching materials in the form of hand-outs, power point slides,
training, modules or textbooks written by the lecturer. 3. Lecturers
have not assessed participation 4. UTS
results have not been submitted to students International
Class 1. Lecturers
have not submitted learning contracts to students 2. Lecturers
only use English 10 - 20% |
Regular
Class: 1. no RPS
update has been done 2. Incomplete
teaching materials in the form of hand-outs, power point slides, training,
modules or textbooks written by lecturers. 3. Still in
note form 4. Have not
finished correcting the midterm exam International
Class 1. lack of
administrative order 2. Lecturers
need to attend English language training |
Regular
Class: 1. Complete
the RPS that contains information about the latest teaching materials 2. Lecturers
complete teaching materials in the form of hand-outs, power point slides,
training, modules or textbooks written by the lecturer. 3. Grading
participation 4. Submit
test results to students International
Class 1. Lecturer
hands over the learning contract to students 2. Provide
English language training to lecturers |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
5 |
1. In regular
classes, the results of the mid-term test have not been handed back to
students 2. In
international classes lecturers use 15% English 3. In
international classes, assignments are not yet organized in English. |
1. Not
finished correcting 2. Lack of
English language skills 3. Lecturers'
inaccuracy in preparing assignments |
1. Close 2. Appeal
letter to the lecturer 3. Close |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
6 |
1. Lecturers
have not provided an assessment of the assignments given to students 2. Lecturers
have not returned graded assignments to students 3. UTS score
results have not been announced back to students 4. Lecturers
have not compiled the rubric for the assessment of UTS and UAS 5.
Assignments and exam questions have not been prepared in English 5. |
1. Not
finished correcting 2. Not
finished correcting 3. Not
finished correcting 4. Lack of
discipline of lecturers in writing UTS UAS questions 5. UPM's
inaccuracy in validating assignments and questions 5. |
1. Grading
the assignments given to students 2. Return
graded assignments to students 3. Return UTS
results to students 4. Lecturers
compile the rubric for the assessment of UTS and UAS 5. Develop
assignments and exam questions using English. |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
7 |
|
1. In
international classes lecturers use 50% English |
Lack of
lecturers' ability to speak English |
1. Lecturer
uses 50% English 2. Make a
monitoring and evaluation report |
|
Fulfilled |
|
|
8 |
Regular Class 1. RPS has
not been designed and developed by lecturers independently/group according to
the development of science and technology with Team-based Project and Case
Method models. 2. RPS has
not been validated by the science clump team 3. The
developed RPS has been approved by the Koorprodi 4. RPS has
contained learning outcomes according to KKNI which consists of knowledge,
attitudes, general skills and special skills 5. Lecturers
have not returned graded assignments to students. 6. Lecturers
have not compiled a rubric for UTS assessment 7. UTS score
results are announced back to students International
Class 1.
Assignments and exam questions have not been prepared in English. 2. UTS
results have not been handed back to students 3. RPS is not
yet bilingual 4. Teaching
materials are not yet bilingual |
Regular: 1. In the
transition period of preparing the old format RPS to the OBE format 2. clump team
not yet authorized by the faculty 3. In the
transition period of preparing the old format RPS to the OBE format 4. In the
transition period of preparing the old format RPS to the OBE format 5. Not
finished correcting 6. Lecturers'
indiscipline in compiling questions 7. Not
finished correcting International: 1. UPM's
inaccuracy in validating questions 2. Not
finished correcting 3. Lecturers'
indiscipline in preparing the RPS 5. Lecturers'
indiscipline in preparing teaching materials 5. |
Regular Class 1. Develop
RPS designed and developed by lecturers independently/group according to the
development of science and technology with Team-based Project and Case Method
models. 2. Validating
the RPS by the science clump team 3. The
developed RPS has been approved by the Koorprodi 4. Develop
RPS that contains learning outcomes according to KKNI consisting of
knowledge, attitudes, general skills and special skills. 5. Return
graded assignments to students. 6. Develop a
rubric for UTS assessment 7. Return the
results of the midterm exam and announce them to the students. International
Class 1. Develop
assignments and exam questions using English. 2. Submit
test results to students 3. Develop a
bilingual SSP 4. Developing
bilingual teaching materials |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
9 |
1. RPS has
not been validated by science clusters 2. RPS does
not yet contain teaching materials that are up-to-date in the last 10 years
and from the results of research and PKM 3. RPS is not
yet bilingual 4. Lecturers
have not assessed participation 5. Lecturers
have not provided an assessment of the assignment 6. Lecturers
have not returned assignments to students 7. Lecturers
have not developed an assessment rubric 8. UTS
results have not been returned |
1. Cluster
team not yet established 2. Has not
updated the RPS 3. Lecturers'
indiscipline in preparing the RPS 4. still in
the form of notes 5. still
being corrected 6. still
being corrected 7. Lecturer
indiscipline 8. still
being corrected |
1. Validating
the RPS by the science clump team 2. Revise the
RPS that contains teaching materials that are up-to-date in the last 10 years
and from the results of research and PKM 3. Develop a
bilingual SSP 4. Grading
participation 5. Grading
the assignment 6. Returning
assignments to students 7. Develop
assessment rubric 8. Returning
UTS Results |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
10 |
Introduction
to Microeconomics 1. Lecturer
has not returned the assignment 2. Lecturers
have not provided an assessment of the assignments given to students 3. Lecturers
have not developed rubrics 4. Lecturer
has not submitted UTS 5.
Assignments and Exam Questions have not been prepared in English. |
1. Not
finished correcting 2. Lecturers'
indiscipline in conducting assessments 3. Lecturers'
indiscipline in preparing questions that are complete with the assessment
rubric 4. Not
finished correcting 5. UPM's
inaccuracy in validating questions 5. |
Introduction
to Microeconomics 1. returning
the task 2. provide
assessment of assignments given to students 3. develop
rubric 4. submitting
test results 5. Develop
assignments and exam questions using English. 4. Make a
report on the instrument and BA of the International Economics course and the
instrument of the Introduction to Business course. |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
11 |
1. There is
no UTS assessment rubric yet 2. Has not
submitted proof of submission of UTS grades 3. Lecturers
do not have teaching materials 4. Lecturers
use English 10-15% 5. UTS
results have not been submitted to students |
1. Lecturers'
indiscipline in preparing questions that are complete with the assessment
rubric 2. Not
finished correcting 3. Lecturer
relies too much on student presentation materials 4. Lack of
lecturers' ability to speak English 5. Not
finished correcting |
1. Develop a
rubric for UTS assessment 2. submit
proof of submission of UTS scores 3. Develop
teaching materials 4. Use
English 10-15% 5. Submit
test results to students |
|
Fulfilled |
Follow-up Plan for Learning RTM ResultsEven Semester 2022/2023
|
No. |
Source |
Findings |
Root of the Problem |
Follow-up |
Feedback Form |
RTM Document |
Status |
|
1 |
RPS has not been
validated by the team in the science clump |
Change of old format RPS
to OBE RPS |
RPS is validated and
signed by the Science clump team |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
2 |
RPS has not been
authorized by Koorprodi |
Change of old format RPS
to OBE RPS |
RPS signed by Head of
Study Program |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
3 |
Lecturers have not yet
assessed student assignments |
The assignment has not
been corrected |
Lecturer gives assignment
assessment |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
4 |
Lecturers have not
returned graded assignments to students |
The assignment has not
been corrected |
The lecturer returns the
assignment and is proven by the Minutes of Return of Assignment |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
5 |
Lecturers have not yet compiled
the rubric for the assessment of UTS and UAS |
Lecturers do not
understand how to compile an assessment rubric |
Lecturers Develop Rubrics
for Midterm and Final Exams |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
6 |
UTS score results have
not been announced Back to students |
UTS has not yet been
corrected |
Lecturer returns the UTS
and is evidenced by the Minutes of Return of Assignment |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
7 |
Lecturers have not
uploaded teaching materials and/or supporting media |
lack of lecturer
discipline |
Lecturers upload teaching
materials on online media |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
8 |
OBE RPS has not been
uploaded in SIAKADU |
obe format RPS
preparation has not been completed |
Lecturer uploads OBE RPS |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
9 |
RPS does not yet contain
information about the latest teaching materials (recommended maximum of the
last 10 years) and from the results of research and community service. |
Have not updated the
learning resources in the RPS |
Update reference on RPS |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
10 |
Lecturers do not yet have
teaching materials in the form of handouts, power points, diktats, modules or
textbooks written by the lecturer. |
Have not developed the
preparation of teaching materials |
Lecturers make teaching
materials according to course needs |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
11 |
Lecturers have not
provided an assessment of student participation (attendance, activeness and
behavior) in learning. |
Still in the process of
small notes have not done the recording |
Lecturer makes
participation assessment |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
12 |
The RPS for international
classes is not yet bilingual. |
not yet transcribed into
English |
RPS is bilingual |
|
Fulfilled |
||
|
13 |
The material does not
match the RPS |
substitute meetings and
lecturers' indiscipline to comply with the RPS |
Lecturers adjust lecture
material to lecture meetings |
|
Fulfilled |
Follow-up Plan for Research RTM ResultsEven Semester 2022/2023
No.
Source
Findings
Root of the Problem
Follow-up
Feedback Form
RTM Document
Status
1
1. There has been no
evaluation of the suitability of lecturers' and students' research with the
roadmap
2. There is no evidence
of using evaluation results to improve research relevance.
3. The study program has
not had funding from research from national funding sources of at least 2
proposals and international funding sources of 1 proposal.
1. Postgraduate to
Faculty transition.
1. Evaluate the
suitability of lecturer and student research with the roadmap
2. Compile evidence of
the use of evaluation results to improve research relevance
3. Apply for DRTPM
research funding and collaboration 2024
https://forms.gle/PoWgytmFFSv2y4St7
Fulfilled
2
1. Never received
collaborative research funding from the Faculty.
1. Never received
collaborative research funding from the Faculty.
Faculties set up funding
next year (2024)
https://forms.gle/PoWgytmFFSv2y4St7
Fulfilled
|
No. |
Source |
Findings |
Root of the Problem |
Follow-up |
Feedback Form |
RTM Document |
Status |
|
1 |
1. There has been no
evaluation of the suitability of lecturers' and students' research with the
roadmap 2. There is no evidence
of using evaluation results to improve research relevance. 3. The study program has
not had funding from research from national funding sources of at least 2
proposals and international funding sources of 1 proposal. |
1. Postgraduate to
Faculty transition. |
1. Evaluate the
suitability of lecturer and student research with the roadmap 2. Compile evidence of
the use of evaluation results to improve research relevance 3. Apply for DRTPM
research funding and collaboration 2024 |
https://forms.gle/PoWgytmFFSv2y4St7 |
Fulfilled |
||
|
2 |
1. Never received
collaborative research funding from the Faculty. |
1. Never received
collaborative research funding from the Faculty. |
Faculties set up funding
next year (2024) |
https://forms.gle/PoWgytmFFSv2y4St7 |
Fulfilled |
Follow-up Plan for Community Service RTM ResultsEven Semester 2022/2023
|
No. |
Source |
Findings |
Root of the Problem |
Follow-up |
Feedback Form |
RTM Document |
Status |
|
1 |
1. Less than 25% of PkM
results are used in learning 2. The absence of
learning activities from the results of PkM activities of lecturers,
education personnel and students at least a number of lecturers in three
years |
1. PkM results have not been
used in learning. 2. PkM results have not
been used in learning |
1. Incorporate pkm
results in learning 2. Incorporate pkm
results into the course RPS |
https://forms.gle/PoWgytmFFSv2y4St7 |
Fulfilled |
||
|
2 |
1. PKM results have not been
used in industrial learning in accordance with their fields 2. There is no document
on the use of facilities and infrastructure for PkM activities in the study
program. |
1. Education Personnel
have never been involved in the PKM program 2. And waiting for the
PKM results seminar to continue the haki process |
1 Incorporate the results
of PKM into the course RPS. 2 Entering sarpras usage
documents |
https://forms.gle/PoWgytmFFSv2y4St7 |
Fulfilled |
